What Level of Detail Is Appropriate and Necessary to Include Within a Claim or Defence Pleading Document?

Lawsuit Documents, Whether As a Claim or a Defence, Should Include Only the Material Facts. Material Facts Are the Details Required For An Understanding of Either the Legal Issues Raised or Response to Legal Issues Raised. Character Attacks or Irrelevant Details Within a Lawsuit Document Are Improper.

Understanding the Requirement to Plead Material Facts Including the Consequences For Failure to Properly Do So

Lawsuit Document The details stated within a lawsuit document, being either a claim or defence, must proper accord with court rules. Details within a lawsuit document may be improper if irrelevant, if scandalous, if embarrassingly containing details that shine a poor light on other persons, or if inherently unprovable.  Improper allegations should be struck out and removed figuratively or even literally.

The Law

The Rules of the Small Claims Court, O. Reg. 258/98 as well as the Rules of the Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 194, address the requirement of detail within pleading documents.  Specifically, the Rules of the Small Claims Court and the Rules of the Civil Procedure state:

7.01 (2) The following requirements apply to the claim:

1. It shall contain the following information, in concise and non-technical language:

...

ii. The nature of the claim, with reasonable certainty and detail, including the date, place and nature of the occurrences on which the claim is based.

9.02 (1) The following requirements apply to the defence:

1. It shall contain the following information:

i. The reasons why the defendant disputes the plaintiff’s claim, expressed in concise non-technical language with a reasonable amount of detail.

25.06 (1) Every pleading shall contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the party relies for the claim or defence, but not the evidence by which those facts are to be proved.

As provided within the procedural rules above, the pleading documents in a lawsuit are to include material facts stated in a clear and concise manner.  What is a material fact, and the restrictions upon how a material fact should be stated was well explained in Stedfasts Inc. v. Dynacare Laboratories, 2020 ONSC 8008, wherein it was stated:

[30]  Material facts include facts that the party pleading is entitled to prove at trial, and at trial, anything that affects the determination of the party’s rights can be proved; accordingly, material facts includes facts that can have an effect on the determination of a party’s rights.[6] A fact that is not provable at the trial or that is incapable of affecting the outcome is immaterial and ought not to be pleaded.[7] A pleading of fact will be struck if it cannot be the basis of a claim or defence and is designed solely for the purposes of atmosphere or to cast the opposing party in a bad light.[8] As described by Riddell J. in Duryea v. Kaufman,[9] such a plea is said to be “embarrassing”.

[31]  “Material” facts include facts that establish the constituent elements of the claim or defence.[10] The causes of action must be clearly identifiable from the facts pleaded and must be supported by facts that are material.[11]

[32]  A pleading shall contain material facts, but it should not contain the evidence by which those facts are to be proved.[12] Pleadings of evidence may be struck out.[13] The prohibition against pleading evidence is designed to restrain the pleading of facts that are subordinate and that merely tend toward proving the truth of the material facts.[14]

As per Stedfasts, a case proceeding in the full Superior Court, pleading evidence, meaning pleading the factual details as to how the material facts will be proven, is micro detail and is prohibited by the Rules of the Civil Procedure.  Simply said, alleging a material fact is proper; however, alleging the evidence that is available to prove the material fact is improper.  Furthermore, while the Rules of the Small Claims Court are silent about the impropriety of pleading evidence, doing so remains frowned upon.  Furthermore, if a Small Claims Court case is, for some unforeseen reason, transferred to the full Superior Court, a Small Claims Court pleading that contains pleadings of evidence, may become problematic in addition to improper.

Summary Comment

The rules of pleading should be carefully adhered to.  Pleadings, whether as a claim document or as a defence document, should contain only material facts without stooping to using a pleading document to engage in character attacks or for making prejudicial statements.  Only statements that are relevant should be contained within a pleading.

When You Need the

Knowledge That

Your Textbooks

Forgot to Teach You.

Sharing Helpful
Hints and Ideas

Get Help Now

For more information, fill out the form below to send a direct inquiry to Paralegal.Coach

ATTENTION: Do not send confidential information through this website form.  Use this website form only for making an introduction.
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 100.24.118.144







Sign Up